ChiTrib using video
chat as chit to bring readers together
Half-hour show covers wide range
of topics, from Cubs to regional transportation.
By Marcelo Duran
Associate Editor
The
Chicago Tribune wants readers to use its Web site to strike up two-way video
conversations with its reporters and newsmakers.
The paper’s Video Chat,
launched last May, is a half-hour program that lets readers ask journalists or
other personalities questions about specific stories or subjects, said Mark
Hinojosa, the Tribune’s associate managing editor of electronic news.
Guests answer the questions,
usually sitting in the Tribune’s television studio. Readers can see the
questions displayed on their Web browsers as the guest addresses the topic.

The Chicago Tribune’s Video Chat program is
shot at the paper’s television studio (below.) Behind the scenes a Tribune
Interactive producer types in questions from the online audience during a live
telecast. The question and answers are then spliced and archived so that way
readers can hears questions on demand.
Photos: Chicago Tribune


An infinite number of people
can watch the chat live, but participant access is limited to 500 simultaneous
users.
Video Chat is the brainchild
of Dwayne Pallanti, a Tribune video engineer, Hinojosa said.
“He has also developed the
paper’s in-house transcoding system and developed compression schemes for video
out of Iraq with a satellite phone,” he said of the engineer. “He had been
working on this idea on his own and brought it to see how we would use it.”
Jumping in the video
sandbox
Chicago Tribune Interactive
Executive Producer Clark Bender said chat allows the paper to engage its
audience in a new and different way.
“We wanted to have a little
more interactivity with our audience,” he said. “You can do regular chat, but it
was good to try video chat because we liked the connection that it had with the
audience.”
A Video Chat requires three
people plus a host or a guest. A producer feeds the questions to the host while
a camera operator and a technical director make sure everything is running
correctly. Sometimes a floor director will be added if one is available.
Bender said Video Chat’s
immediate feedback and the show’s ability to allow users to submit questions are
some of the program’s strongest hallmarks.
“We felt like it added another
level of personalization and that made it a more interesting experience.”
Archived copies
Once the program is over,
readers can access archived episodes and explore the broadcast by clicking on
specific questions as they are displayed.
“When we finish the show we
encode it in Flash and put it back into the player in a different format,”
Hinojosa said. “You can see all the questions that were asked and you can click
on the questions and get the answer.”
Thus far, Tribune Interactive
has produced more than 25 Video Chats, covering such topics as Chicago’s
professional sports teams and financial pressures plaguing the Chicago
Transportation Authority.
The shows aren’t regularly
scheduled, but Bender said that is one of Tribune Interactive’s goals. “We’ve
done a few dozen but we don’t have a particular time every week that we do
them,” he said.
Prior to each show, Tribune
Interactive solicits questions in advance so that producers have a backlog of
questions to start the program.
“As great as it is to have
something live, it’s kind of hard to drive people (to the site) at the exact
time you are doing it,” Bender said. “We tend to try and do them over the lunch
hour because we are assuming that people are at their computers at the office
and have some time to watch.”
Room for improvement
Bender said the show has faced
few technical bumps.
“The bigger learning curve has
been determining good programming to do with this,” he said. “Sometimes, we’ve
had writers come in and the topic was too broad and other times we’ve had more
specific issues like real estate zoning in Chicago.”
With no set host or style the
show can be like a box of chocolates, but the different topics also bring
different people to the news site, Bender said.
“It’s been interesting to
figure out what some of the programming challenges are in terms of what’s
appealing to people,” he said. “It’s more about engaging our audience, keeping
them on the site, keeping them interested and engaging them in issues of the
day.”
Although Bender said the
Tribune has received positive feedback from the show, it’s too early to tell if
Video Chat has translated into a dramatic upswing in Web traffic.
“I don’t think we’ve ever had
any delusions that we’re going to have thousands and thousands of people
watching these chats. Maybe someday we can grow into that. Right now it’s
something of a toe in the water as we figure out what we are going to do,” he
said. “The bigger issue is getting the chats in front of more people, either
live or archived.”
Looking for a draw
Hinojosa said that Video Chat
has allowed the Tribune to cover a variety of topics in a different way, but
that he is still searching for “franchise” subjects that would guarantee a
consistent audience draw.
Sometimes, inspiration occurs
when least expected, he said, citing one idea he thought of to conduct remote
chats. “All of a sudden my boss asked if we could use it,” he said. “Then we
started playing with the format, doing remote chats in New Hampshire and in
Arizona when the Cubs were in the playoffs.”
The Tribune’s most recent
Video Chat effort covered last month’s Super Tuesday primaries and featured six
separate Video Chats with presidential primary coverage spanning three cities
(see sidebar, page 46).
“We would like to put it on a
more permanent schedule so that people could know it will be on every day or
every Tuesday at a certain time,” said Bender. “We are going to do this but we
are feeling our way through what we think is going to be worth that kind of
regular effort.”
|
Super Tuesday
for Video Chat
Feb. 5, 2008 was also a Super Tuesday for Chicago Tribune Interactive
when it produced six Video Chats with presidential primary coverage
spanning three U.S. cities.
The Video Chats were
hosted by a moderator in Chicago who spent time with guests from Newsday
in Long Island, N.Y., the Los Angeles Times and Tribune’s Washington
D.C., bureau, all of whom provided news and updated the latest returns
from the 22-state primary.
The idea to do the
Super Tuesday Video Chat was spawned in early January, said Mark
Hinojosa, the Tribune’s associate managing editor of electronic news.
“We were looking at
the map saying we have newspapers in three of the biggest states
competing on Super Tuesday,” he said. “Ideally, we wanted to do the CNN
way, which means we would be able to jump between all four sites at
once.”
Although the Tribune
couldn’t do that, it did figure out a schedule where it could run six
chats. Each one would start in Chicago and go out to the other sites.
Election night saw 13
Tribune employees working to produce the chats, but they were joined by
other personnel who worked on the project leading up to event.
Their contributions
included setting up high-speed, secure connections for each video feed.
“We had connections
from our papers to their partner television stations but we had to make
sure they could get their feeds to us,” said Hinojosa.
While the Chats ran
successfully, Hinojosa said they didn’t receive the audience he had
hoped.
But he contributes the
low participation to the fact that the papers didn’t have the time to
properly promote the event.
“We didn’t do a
terrific marketing campaign,” he said. “And one of the things we are
learning is that when you drive somebody to a new site, you are asking a
reader to do a lot to leave a page where all the information is and have
him or her do something they aren’t familiar with.
“We’re playing with
ideas on how to make the experience more immediate and how to give
somebody a better example of a video chat.”
—Marcelo Duran |