Hybrid sustainability
still unanswered
By David Zepeda
Special to Newspapers & Technology
As I listened intently to the
guest speaker at a Leadership in Quality event sponsored by the University of
Minnesota’s Carlson School of Management, a particular word was emphasized that
captivated my attention.
The word was “sustainability”
and its meaning has renewed impact as newspapers consider the new hybrid
production choices now available.
As print circulation continues
to weaken and newspapers anxiously look for additional sources of revenue,
publishers are examining alternative forms of revenue that go beyond printing
the core product.
But what are the implications
of pursuing such a strategy?
Very seldom, if at all, is the
concept of strategy and sustainability even mentioned, much less emphasized.
Yet the operational and
financial impact of pursuing a hybrid production strategy is by no means
insignificant.
Hastily chasing
Are newspapers strategically
considering hybrid production or are they panicking and hastily chasing after
opportunities without considering the lasting implications of such decisions?
Some newspapers are making the
strategic choice to outsource certain production functions, while others are
deciding to maintain production control and compete as hybrid printers. Those
who choose the latter have to face the critical question of competing in a
hybrid production environment without losing sight of their core product
offerings.
I classify the newspaper
industry as highly vertically integrated, due to the level of control that the
traditional newspaper has over its supply chain — from gathering news to
producing and distributing the final product.
As such, there are an
abundance of specialized resources in the various functions of the newspaper
that focus on producing and delivering the final product every single morning to
homes, businesses, and other outlets.
In contrast, a hybrid
production strategy requires a competence along additional competitive
dimensions in order to produce a wider range of products, in a timely and
quality-oriented manner, while minimizing the costs associated with production.
In addressing this issue, the
industry has directed most of its focus to exploiting underutilized production
capacity by increasing the flexibility of a newspaper’s production operation.
The result is a shift from the
traditional mass production mentality to a new more flexible manufacturing
strategy. Many see technology as the enabler of such a transition, and a number
of vendors at this year’s Nexpo displayed products and services that support
hybrid production, from job quoting systems to UV dryers and closed-loop ink
control.
Yet the industry still has to
determine how to transform those technologies into a competitive advantage.
Commercial printers, on the
other hand, actively compete along multiple dimensions for every single job that
is produced. Flexibility, high quality, and low cost are essential in order to
remain competitive. Printing is their core business and those that are
successful do it very well.
Hybrid production
opportunities
Moreover, commercial printers
are also exploiting hybrid production opportunities.
Transcontinental Inc., to name
only one, has aggressively pursued newspapers. Its 15-year, $1 billion contract
with Hearst to print the San Francisco Chronicle is just the first step in what
could be a series of U.S. plants built and operated by the Canadian printer.
Transcontinental has
successfully capitalized on its hybrid production competence and has translated
it into a sustainable advantage. Are newspapers ready to compete, day after day,
with highly experienced commercial printers like Transcon?
Simply having the technology
to be more flexible does not necessarily translate to competitiveness — much
less a sustainable advantage.
So how should newspapers
approach a hybrid production strategy? It may come down to whether or not the
strategic choices pursued are sustainable or not.
I’ll explore this topic in
more depth in future Viewpoints. I’ll discuss the definition of a competitive
dimension, the foundation of a sustainable competitive advantage, and how
everything fits into a newspaper’s neatly packaged strategy.
David
Zepeda has more than 10 years’ experience in the printing industry. He is in the
Operations & Management Science doctoral program at the University of Minnesota
and also provides consulting services to the industry. He can be reached at
zepe0003@umn.edu.