The International Journal 
of Newspaper Technology

Home  | Newspapers & Technology | Prepress Technology | Online Technology | IFRA/WAN/International News
 | Free Subscription | Contact Us | Newspaper Links | Trade Show Listing |




Sept.

2006





 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 














 

 

Best of both worlds

By Richard Cichelli
Special to Newspapers & Technology


“Give me whereon to stand and I will move the earth,” said the Greek mathematician Archimedes. Fair enough.

Leave it to another mathematician, Elementus Maximus, to augment that claim. “Give me a long enough lever and a place to put the fulcrum and I’ll move the earth.”

Once the perfect tools were levers. Now they’re database management systems. In the advocacy of levers, however,  the devil is still in the details. The trick is to extract the confusing details and leave the essential understanding.

 

When talking to prospective newspaper customers, we hear several recurring refrains. “Do you use QuarkXPress or Adobe InDesign for pagination?” “What database do you use?”

If you have a vision for how systems should be built, then neither of these questions should likely top your list. Let me tell you how I think about it.

Newspapers require highly functional systems to efficiently run their businesses. Some of the tools they need are very specific to them. An integrated newspaper system for all but the smallest of newspapers is a highly complex collection of software.

Building newspaper software involves solving some very large and complex problems. As development progresses, you hope that the software will not grow so dauntingly complex as to preclude providing a functional, installable and maintainable solution.

That said, the question is this: What tools will help you build, maintain and install newspaper software?

 

Problem solving

This is an engineering issue that has to do with problem solving. Problems are either small and can be solved in a single step, or large and require a solution composed of numerous steps. Envision a number of steps and that each step might be small and solved immediately.

Either way, here’s the question when building newspaper applications, or any software for that matter: How do you break big problems down into smaller problems that you can solve?

Understanding this is easier than you might think. You know your computer has programs and data. The programs examine and modify the data; for example, Microsoft Word can be used to change the data in a Word document.

Now, documents are a type of data, and data is something used to describe nouns. The data is stored in memory (RAM, disks, tapes, etc.). You want the memory to be big. Then there’s the processor. It is the processor’s job to change the data based on programs. The processor should be fast. Programs are made up of instructions, which are verbs - everything from add and subtract to sort and save.

In a world where there are verbs and nouns (or operators and operands), factoring big problems into small ones requires choosing between refining a verb or a noun at each step of the problem-solving process.

 

Noun-centric view

Database management systems essentially facilitate a view of the world based on nouns. If someone tells you, “I have the perfect database management system for newspapers,” they’re saying they think they can build complex systems such as those newspapers use based on a noun-centric view of the world.

But remember, the devil is in the details. Clearly, some pieces of a newspaper system can be built effectively around a database view of information processing technology. And, of course, if such a tool exists that manipulates the types of data newspapers deal with (everything from text to pictures, etc.), then this view is likely to yield useful solutions. For example, managing newsprint inventory is easily done in a database context. Paginating classifieds quickly and optimally is not.

A problem arises, however, when a vendor claims for an enterprise advertising system or enterprise newsroom system that, “everything can be stored in the database.” Such a solution would entail significant complexity because it’s unlikely that the whole could be understood from a conglomeration of all the parts.

Any system with more than 100 different types of database entities is considered large. (In database terminology, a database entity is something like the set of customers, or ads or insertion orders.) Our advertising front-end system with its billing and sales management tools has nearly 275 entities - a very large number. Our Layout-8000 ad dummying software has well over 150. So, by now you can understand that simply having the right database and putting in all the data isn’t appropriate if you want to build, install and maintain newspaper systems.

 

Factored by verbs

The challenge of building newspaper systems can also be factored by verbs. In this view one thinks of “taking ads” as opposed to “ad records.” If you build an enterprise newspaper system around verbs, you would say your system has a service-oriented architecture. Some of the services a newspaper software package might have include wire capture, ad entry, billing, accounts receivable, ad dummying and classified pagination, among other components.

If I wanted to have a system built around a service-oriented architecture, what database would I choose? The answer is simple. Service-oriented architectures are about verbs; database-oriented architectures are about nouns. Both are clearly appropriate in some cases and clearly inappropriate in others - and neither is appropriate for all cases.

 

Service-oriented architectures

Service-oriented architectures have a number of desirable attributes. Since the pieces are functionally oriented, new releases of different services can come out independently. Since the subsystems are distributed and based on exchanging and replicating data rather than storing it in a single place, system upgrades are greatly simplified. And, of course, it’s much easier in a system built on services to attach components from a number of different vendors.

With a service-oriented approach, you get to build an integrated system from “best of breed” technology.

There are numerous technical advantages to a service-oriented architecture as well. Transactions can take place across application servers based on numerous data services. Data can be replicated where required according to the underlying distribution model. Again, buying multiple applications from different vendors is made much easier. The constraints of a single database often prove to be a vendor’s Achilles’ heel.

 

Linked together

One of the characteristics of well-engineered service-oriented applications is that the components are tied together via messaging. Today the messaging technology of choice is based on XML. Messaging, not a database, is the key to building service-oriented systems - especially those that use the Web.

For those who anticipated that I would identify Oracle, MySQL, MS-SQL, PostgreSQL, or some other database-oriented tool as the perfect technology for building newspaper systems, I apologize.

Is there a perfect database? The perfect database is the one which, when mentioned along with other magic words by a vendor’s salesperson, provides a unique and compelling selling message. If you can’t sell what the application does, sell its database.

 

Richard Cichelli is president of Software Consulting Services, a 30-year-old newspaper systems vendor. He can be reached at 610.746.7700.