By David Lewis
Special to Newspapers & Technology
The
price hikes that vendors are passing through to newspapers aren’t likely to
end anytime soon.
The
first massive wave has already come from ink, plastics and prepress consumable
suppliers. Agfa and Fujifilm unit Enovation Graphics are among the latest to
announce price hikes in the United States, while Kodak Graphic Communications
Group raised prepress consumables prices in its Europe and Greater Asia regions.
Vendors
say they are squeezed by ever-escalating raw materials costs and can no longer
hold back passing those increases onto their newspaper customers.
Consider
the following:
*2005
aluminum costs neared $2,400 per ton, almost double 2003 prices, fueled in part
by spot shortages.
*Silver
hit $9.53 a troy ounce in February, doubling 2003 prices.
*Polyester
feedstock for film rose 30 percent in the past three years.
*Polyethylene
resin, used in plastic bags, rose 15 percent.
*Crude
oil prices rose 30 percent in the past year and have tripled since 2001.
*Natural
gas prices soared from $4 per million Btu in the 2000-2002 time frame to as high
as $11 per million Btu, according to US Ink vice president of operations Larry
Lepore.
When
Agfa rolled out what it termed “substantial” price increases in late
February, any notion that last year’s price spikes from ink and paper
companies would be isolated were quickly extinguished.
Agfa
pegged the hike to “soaring prices of silver and aluminum (reaching 17- and
19-year highs, respectively) as well as continued energy and transportation cost
increases” and a decision to maintain R&D spending.
The
company, like other manufacturers struggling with the rising price of raw
materials, said it would continue its concomitant effort to cut costs through
technology and process improvements. But all the cost savings in the world could
no longer compensate for the company’s materials prices increases.
“If
you look at the marketplace recently you will see that just about every supplier
of lithoplates has raised their prices because their commodity prices are
impossible to absorb,” said Tom Saggiomo, president of Agfa Graphic Systems in
North America. “Pressure on prices for lithoplates will continue in the coming
months; it is not going to abate.”
“The
costs of these commodities have been rising geometrically just in the general
sense,” said Kathy McHugh, Eastman Kodak Co.’s Norwalk, Conn.-based Graphic
Communications Group vice president of marketing and strategy, prepress
consumables. “Everybody has done their best to take costs out of their own
manufacturing processes, to absorb these prices, and we have for years. But it
does reach the point where you just can’t continue to do it.
“That’s
really the key message, and that’s why you see across-the-board increases by
manufacturers within the industry,” she said.
Plastics
rapped
As
for plastic products, “There were increases, some in the beginning of 2005,
and then resin went really crazy in December,” said Peter Taylor, president
and chief executive officer of Ontario, Canada-based Discovery Packaging, which
makes a variety of plastic bags and extruded films.
Like
many another manufacturers, Taylor’s pricing power is limited by the fact that
plastic newspaper bags are a commodity product. Discovery rode out the worst of
the price increases and spot shortages of polyethylene resin by working closely
with suppliers.
News
ink providers, meantime, are wrestling with material cost increases in just
about every sector imaginable.
Take,
for example, pigment intermediate costs, jolted by the rising cost of crude oil
and crude derivatives, which increased by 5 percent to 8 percent in the first
quarter of this year alone, said US Ink’s Lepore.
Like
the consumables makers, ink manufacturers say that, as prices have risen and
risen, they have undertaken heroic efforts to institute efficiencies aimed at
stemming the tide.
“We
have been spending considerable effort looking for ways to take costs out of our
organization,” said Norm Harbin, Flint Group’s vice president of business
and technical development. “We have closed some facilities, so that now we
have fewer facilities making larger quantities of ink. Over the years we have
just looked for better sources of materials and we have cut down on headcount in
the organization, like any other business. So we’re doing what every other
business is trying to do - trying to lower our cost of goods sold to make up for
increases in raw materials.”
All
points alarm?
Yet,
having analyzed the situation, Harbin is issuing an all-points alarm. Ink
supplies, he says, are vulnerable to a potential triple whammy that could push
prices higher and even force shortages:
Whammy
No. 1: Rising prices of crude oil and natural gas, ink’s predominant raw
materials.
Whammy
No. 2: The growing global shortages of naphthenic petroleum, the kind needed to
make printer’s ink, which have been compounded by the vagaries of
Venezuela’s President Hugo Ch‡vez. Venezuela, California and the North Sea
are the three remaining regions producing naphthenic petroleum. Most of the
stuff today comes from the North Sea, adding to transportation and other costs.
Whammy
No. 3: Dwindling refining resources for naphthenic petroleum, especially the
Venezuelan type, which is acidic and tough to refine. Three U.S. refineries
still refine naphthenic crude, in California, Arkansas and Louisiana. Hurricane
Katrina knocked out the Louisiana facility for a time, which tightened supplies
even further.
Rita
and Katrina illustrated the weak links in ink’s supply chain. “The Louisiana
refinery lost power,” Harbin said, although the complex was relatively
undamaged. “If there was a catastrophic event in that particular refinery,
there would be big problems in the industry very quickly, because there’s no
way there would be the capacity to make that up.”
Meanwhile,
as of February, 25 percent of the Gulf of Mexico’s daily oil production
remained off-line, Harbin said. And only 22 of the 183 pipelines destroyed by
the twin storms have resumed operations.
More
than storms
But
last year’s cataclysmic hurricane season explains only part of why commodity
prices have risen so far and so quickly.
Instead,
industry observers say, the prime culprit is a supply-demand equation that’s
seriously out of whack.
Consider
aluminum: “Demand for aluminum is not going to go down and we have these huge
emerging markets that are coming on,” said McHugh at Kodak.
Clark
Casson, president and chief operating officer at plate vendor Southern
Lithoplate Inc., said the metal’s pricing is hammered by multiple factors:
First, a two-year shortage of alumina, the stuff derived from bauxite that’s
transformed into aluminum; second, rising demand from the aerospace and
automotive industries; third, the closure of older U.S. aluminum smelters in
large part because of rising energy and electricity prices; and last,
competition from emerging economies such as China’s.
Agfa’s
Saggiomo echoes Casson’s contention about the effect of reduced smelter
capacity and higher energy costs on aluminum’s price ascendance, but isn’t
as quick to point a finger at the China syndrome.
“(International)
demand for aluminum is not skyrocketing,” he said. “In fact, on average,
last year the overall growth in aluminum demand was about 5 percent,” a
typical increase. “What’s happened, though, is that the aluminum producers
have taken smelting capacity off-line.”
Meantime,
“Aluminum buyers around the globe right now are trying to determine whether we
have hit the peak, and will it be coming back down now,” said Casson, who
added that Southern Lithoplate is dealing with the cost increases through a
“blend of highly efficient, highly modernized manufacturing.”
“We
have invested over the years in cost reductions and we’re partnering with
their vendors to try to do our best to control costs. I don’t think there’s
any magic to it.” Still, in February Southern Lithoplate was forced to
announce only its second increase in prices in the last nine years, he said.
On
the other hand, computer-to-plate vendor ECRM Imaging Systems has been able to
hold the line on price increases, said Jim Luttrell, marketing director. “The
interesting thing with violet computer-to-plate technology or the violet polymer
technology is that, even though there are across-the-board increases because of
the price of aluminum, there has been a dramatic relative drop in the price of
violet plates.”
Despite
the gloomy perspective, there is a bright side. One bit of good news is that
vendors have not raised prices anywhere near the increase in their raw materials
costs, nor have they stopped looking for efficiencies. Also, the capitalist
economy is cyclical: Vendors already are moving to bring the benefits of
innovation to their newspaper customers. Case in point: Discovery Packaging
developed Rapid Close self-sealing bags, in part to satisfy customers’ desire
to cut double-bagging costs, and in part as a way to escape the commodity
pricing straight-jacket of polyurethane newspaper bags (see “Canadian
company offering new protection for newspapers,” Newspapers &
Technology, September 2005.
And
things could be worse, said Hal Hinderliter, director of graphic communications
at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. “The cost of employees’ health insurance
increases has been similar to the increase in the price of aluminum, but
multiplied over four employees or more this has a far greater effect on
operations. Other issues are having a far greater impact on printers and
publishers than the price of plates, or even the price of ink.”
David
Lewis is a Denver-based freelance writer. He can be reached at lewiscommunications@comcast.net.