|
For
love of pad, or how to cut operating costs
By Darin Miller
Special to Newspapers & Technology
Despite
encouraging industry forecasts, saving money by reducing operating costs
continues to be an important initiative for newspapers of all sizes.
Case
in point: Reducing waste. Among the many day-to-day operations newspapers
perform, cutting waste offers a high return at a low cost.
Consider
pad, defined as the excess copies produced to satisfy home-delivery and
single-copy orders.
For
the most part, initiatives to reduce pad, also known as non-paid good copies,
originate within and focus on individual departments.
But
pad should be considered a systemic issue, relating to the entire newspaper
operation. Frequently, attempts to reduce pad within the boundaries of each
department overlook opportunities to rethink the role of pad in a newspaper
system.
Two
forms
Pad
appears in two broad functional forms: forecasting and operating.
Forecasting
pad are those additional copies built into a press run to account for potential
shortages that may result in meeting paid circulation demand. It’s most
apparent among Sunday products (such as purchased TV books and printed ROP
sections) due to longer lead times.
By
contrast, operating pad are the additional copies printed to cover spoils and
shortages during the production and distribution process. These would include
copies printed to offset spoilage during insert runs.
By
determining how forecasting and operating pad occurs, newspapers can achieve
ongoing savings in a number of areas, including:
*Improving
press order forecasting of off-deadline product.
*Reducing
pad needed for spoilage and shortages.
*Improving
workflow to minimize pad dependency and double-counting.
*Increasing
accountability of single-copy returns.
Pad
reduction methodology
The
objective of a pad study is to minimize, not eliminate, pad. Pad, at appropriate
levels, is a cost-effective means of managing a variable production environment.
Without
proper controls, pad becomes excessive and costly. One medium-sized metropolitan
newspaper revealed it spent more than $1.5 million annually to print non-paid
copies, according to a recent study.
But
newspapers can easily uncover sources of pad, assess needs and determine
appropriate quantities. To do that, they should do the following:
*Conduct
hands-on observations and interact with the front-line individuals who control
and use pad.
*Develop
maps of the production order process and corresponding sources of pad.
*Build
a case study of the press order for two days: the most constrained daily edition
and a Sunday edition.
*Track
press order fulfillment during the same case study days.
*Track
leftover copies during the case study days.
*Identify
functional uses of the pad quantities.
*Benchmark
best practices.
These
core steps will serve as a platform to reveal pad issues and identify tangible
improvement opportunities.
Pad
reduction opportunities
The
spirit of a pad study is to tighten and rebuild, from the ground up, the need
for pad, the controls to prevent misuse and the reports to track additional
opportunity.
Some
common themes that arise out of such a study are:
*Incumbent
practice - Quite often pad quantities were defined generations ago. A common
response to inquiries about establishment of pad levels is, “I don’t know.
It’s always been that way.”
*Lack
of controls and accountability - Many newspapers have over-empowered employees
to alter press orders. Process mapping may reveal lack of central accountability
and excessive steps in the press order process. Consequently, no one is truly
aware of how much pad is printed each day and night. Controls become even more
relevant in deterring fraudulent processing of single-copy returns.
*Breaking
the addiction - Resistance to change is natural. Newspaper operations that
depend on heavy doses of pad have trained employees to depend upon pad or use it
as a crutch. Teams should seize opportunities to break molds and norms.
*Technology
- Software doesn’t always work without occasional modification. In one recent
study, a newspaper’s circulation application couldn’t generate distinct
press orders and pad quantities by press run, within the same edition. As a
consequence, the paper was forced to train employees to alter the press order
taken from the circulation database. The result was an expert system difficult
to supervise and account for. Nobody understood how much pad was needed except
the expert who mentally adjusted the press order prior to each press run. The
solution? The app was edited to provide distinct orders by product, eliminating
the need for experts to manage press orders.
*Leverage
synergies - A systemic approach to pad reduction will reveal opportunities to
use pad cross-functionally. In most every case, newspaper department managers
point to one or two instances where they needed all of their allocated pad to
satisfy demand. Indeed, these managers insist they would have been lost unless
they had access to all of their allocated pad. Yet because pad is rarely used at
peak levels in every department at the same time, unused pad upstream can become
a viable source for downstream pad requirements. A few examples include using
production pad for field shortages, single-copy returns for tearsheets and
B-copies for employees.
*
Forecasting errors - Maintaining historical data of paid circulation orders
helps make forecasts more accurate. An equally important opportunity is reducing
the window between the order deadline and publication. This can be accomplished
by exploiting long-standing relationships with vendors that supply such products
as comics and TV guides, but it also applies to in-house ROP schedules.
*
Lack of procedures - Recently, at a newspaper that was constantly hindered by
press overruns, an investigation revealed that the press crew was not receiving
timely notification and verification of copy count from the mailroom.
Implementing procedures to ensure communication between the mailroom and the
press room solved the problem.
*
Continuous improvement - Finally, maintaining and continuing pad reductions
requires a standard reporting system. Monthly or quarterly reviews should be
used to monitor progress and revisit pre-defined pad levels.
Darin
Miller is senior process consultant at McClier. He can be reached at
303.228.3061 or by e-mail at darin.miller@mcclier.com.
|