Newspapers that rely on telemarketing to acquire
new subscribers better get used to a never-ending busy signal.
Due to current and proposed privacy legislation,
newspapers’ use of telemarketing and other direct-marketing tactics could
disappear within the next few years.
This new regulatory constraint will severely
impact subscription-based businesses that rely on telemarketing, including
newspapers, magazines, cable and telecommunications companies. Newspapers in
particular will be hard hit by these privacy restrictions.
Cold calling core tool
As we all know, most newspapers rely on
unsolicited telemarketing to obtain new subscribers. Because most newspapers
have a yearly churn rate exceeding 100 percent, publishers have to get four new
orders for every existing subscriber merely to maintain their current
subscription levels. Eliminating telemarketing will severely curtail the use of
a primary subscriber retention weapon.
| Legislation on privacy
An alphabet soup of legislation governs
data privacy. A few of the major initiatives:
• Cable Communications Policy Act (CCPA)
• Children’s Online Privacy
Protection Act (C0PPA)
• Customer Proprietary Network
Information Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CPNI)
• The Electronic Communications Privacy
Act (ECPA)
• Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)
• Family Education Rights & Privacy
Act (FERPA)
• Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA)
• Gramm-Leach-Bliley-Act (GLBA)
• Health Insurance Portability &
Accountability Act (HIPAA)
• Identity Theft Assumption &
Deterrence Act (ITADA)
• Privacy Act (PA)
• Right to Financial Privacy Act (RFPA) |
Consider the numbers: According to data we’ve
accumulated analyzing numerous newspapers, only 40 percent of a publication’s
subscriber base can be considered loyal. The majority, 60 percent, falls into
the churn category; that is, they do not automatically renew their subscription
without aggressive retention and reacquisition tactics — most often fueled by
telemarketing.
All newspaper companies should be asking
themselves: “Will we lose 60 percent of our subscriber base? What will the
impact be on circulation and advertising revenue?”
Slow and uneven development
In the United States, privacy policy and law has
developed slowly and unevenly. Recently, however, federal and state lawmakers
have been more inclined to pass more stringent privacy legislation.
These laws are divided into two categories.
The first, data privacy legislation, prevents or
restricts companies or organizations from collecting, storing, exchanging,
selling or using a particular consumer’s data.
The second, contact privacy legislation, stops
firms from contacting consumers without their expressed or implied consent.
Both sets of laws dramatically limit how a
newspaper can attract new subscribers.
Data privacy
For years, direct marketers have been able to
collect, purchase and use an abundant amount of information about a consumer.
This data collection might be as simple as purchasing address information for
every household in a particular market. Or it could be as advanced as purchasing
individual-level demographic information, including age, gender, income, credit
score or even the propensity for responding to a direct marketing offer.
The days are numbered for this type of data
collection and usage. Legislation has already been adopted by several agencies
and governments that severely curtail these practices and most industry experts
agree that the noose will be further tightened.
The result? Marketers will only be able to
collect and use data from consumers who have expressly provided their
permission. And consumers don’t readily provide that permission.
Indications are clear that as consumers become
aware of mechanisms that prevent telemarketers’ use of their personal data,
they will use those tools.
The upshot: The newspaper industry will see an
exponential decrease in the amount of consumer data available to direct
marketers.
A potpourri of data privacy legislation has been
percolating worldwide. Some examples:
• The European Union-United States (EU-US) Safe
Harbor Agreement, in which major U.S. businesses have committed to meet EU data
protection standards.
• The Financial Services Modernization Act (Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act), which requires financial institutions to send consumers yearly notices on
how their personal financial data is used, has resulted in incremental changes
and heightened awareness of issues.
• The Online Personal Privacy Act (S-2201),
introduced into the Senate in 2002, would require Internet companies to obtain
consumers’ consent via an opt-in mechanism before collecting personally
identifiable sensitive information and require an opt-out mechanism to let
consumers manage personally identifiable non-sensitive information. The bill
builds on an earlier version crafted by the Senate in 2000 to align U.S. privacy
policy with some of the norms adopted by the European Union governing online
companies’ ability to collect personal information. This measure aims to
create a national online privacy policy that would preempt individual state
regulations.
Contact privacy
Companies that rely heavily on non-permission
based, direct marketing tactics for getting their message out also will have to
rethink that strategy. With current legislative efforts under way to regulate or
prohibit non-opt-in marketing tactics, some marketing channels (including direct
mail, e-mail marketing and telemarketing) will be severely curtailed or
eliminated.
The Federal Trade Commission’s plan to curb
unwanted telephone solicitations includes the implementation of a national
do-not-call registry. (See Newspapers & Technology, February 2003.) This
registry will replace industry-sponsored voluntary programs. All businesses
engaged in telemarketing will be required to use the list and update their list
of restricted numbers every three months.
Currently, 33 states have DNC legislation, with
consumer participation topping 50 percent in many cases. That level of
participation leads observers to believe that a national DNC program will sign
up in excess of 60 million households — eliminating a substantial chunk of
sales prospects.
While newspapers have been lobbying heavily that
they should be exempt from DNC rules, few expect any legislative relief.
Moving forward
Yet all is not lost. Newspaper companies should
be moving forward now on several initiatives to help alleviate the impact of
privacy restrictions. Consider the following:
• Establish a task force to address the issues.
• Develop accurate segmentation and profiling
schemas of your subscriber database to clearly identify and provide a numerical
score related to the “loyalty” of both subscribers and prospects.
• Implement advanced opt-in marketing programs
that will allow you to continue to collect consumer information and use that
information for direct marketing. These opt-in tactics should be at multiple
customer touchpoints and based on consumer triggers.
• Build a sophisticated marketing database and
implement an advanced campaign management system to deliver your opt-in tactics.
Media companies will be forced to develop
proprietary customer data and information sources instead of purchasing customer
data and will need to rely on opt-in programs and other marketing tactics to
interact with customers.
Begin that journey now. Do not wait until you
lose 60 percent of your subscribers.
Scott A. Stawski is the client executive for
the media and entertainment business unit at Inforte Corp., a customer and
demand management consultancy that helps clients improve customer interactions,
revenue forecasting and profitability. He can be reached at 312.540.0900 or via
e-mail at scott.stawski@inforte.com.