Newspapers have sent hundreds of reporters,
photographers and other personnel to cover the war in Iraq, but the conflict had
far less impact on newspapers’ production departments.
In an informal survey conducted by Newspapers
& Technology, only a handful of newspapers said they lost production
personnel to active military service.
One paper that did, The Dallas Morning News, was
able to cushion the loss of a production support machinist called up by the U.S.
Army, said Paul Webb, The News’ vice president of production.
“We miss him and we look forward to him
returning,” he said. “Fortunately, our staff is large enough we can absorb
something like that.”
Tribune Co., meanwhile, had nine employees called
to active duty across its media properties, said a corporate spokesperson. Of
the nine, one has already returned.
Pay, benefits continue
Those production staffers recalled to active duty
are covered by federal legislation that protects their jobs. The Uniformed
Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, signed into law in October
1994, requires that companies have in place policies that govern how they will
treat employees called into service.
USERRA doesn’t require employers to compensate
employees called up, but all the major group publishers contacted by Newspapers
& Technology said they would continue to offer salary and benefits as their
policies dictate.
At The Morning News, for example, Webb said Belo
Corp., which owns the newspaper, will pay the machinist full pay and benefits
for a one-year period.
The Tribune offers full salary for 90 days and
will pay the difference between an employee’s military compensation and his
normal Tribune pay for an additional 90 days beyond that.
The New York Times Co. pays its called-up
reservists full salary and benefits indefinitely, according to a spokesman.
Low impact
For every paper that had to rearrange its staff
scheduling to accommodate personnel shipped overseas, dozens of others felt no
impact.
“We haven’t lost anybody,” said Frank
Anthony, vice president of production at the Chattanooga (Tenn.) Times Free
Press. The paper, with more than 500 staffers, could handle the loss of “a
number of people” across multiple departments without severe impact, he said.
That’s the same situation experienced by the
Rochester (N.Y.) Democrat and Chronicle, according to Bernie Szachara, the daily’s
vice president of production. “Fortunately, we’ve been pretty lucky here,”
he said. “We had some early warnings that one or two employees might get
called up, but none actually came to pass.”
Szachara said Gannett Co. Inc., which owns the
newspaper, has “supportive” guidelines governing how its properties should
handle various situations in the event circumstances change.
The Seattle Times, the Mobile (Ala.) Register,
the Blade in Toledo, Ohio, and the Exponent-Telegram in Clarksburg, W. Va.,
among others responding to the Newspapers & Technology survey, also said
they hadn’t had any production personnel called up for military duty. The New
York Daily News declined to comment while The New York Times, acknowledging it
lost some employees to military service, didn’t say how many staffers were
called up or how their departure affects operations.